Implausible but true?

3 Quotes in 3 Days Challenge: Day 3

“The problem with fiction, it has to be plausible. That’s not true with non-fiction.” — Tom Wolfe

My first reaction to this quote is to disagree with it. Because if I started reading a nonfiction book on self-publishing (for example), and I found the author’s introduction — and the stated or implied promises within — to be implausible, I probably wouldn’t keep reading it.

Or I might keep reading, but with doubt lingering in my mind, waiting for a line that would finally convince me that the author must be delusional or lying.

Can you think of a nonfiction book you’ve read that promised or related something that you considered implausible?

In some cases, what you read in a particular non-fiction book may sound implausible but may still be true.

The example that come to my mind immediately is the Bible. Someone approaching the Bible with nothing more than curiosity may well find plenty between its covers implausible. I know that I’ve read it at times with a confrontational mindset, questioning everything that sounded implausible to me.

I now try to remember to ask the book’s author — the Holy Spirit — to help me as I read His book, to gently illuminate my mind, and to remind me that I can’t hope to understand His words if I read through the lens of pride and of over-dependence on my own intellect.

God gave us minds to think, but they work so much better when aligned with His.

When we’re reading an argument written by someone else, we understand it better when we bother to see the argument from the other person’s perspective. We allow ourselves to see it through the other person’s lens, which involves risk.

It doesn’t mean we have to agree with the other person’s argument, but it helps us to avoid countering it in a way that fails to address its essential points.

(Which leaves them pulling their hair out and saying, “That’s not what I was saying at all! You’re not paying attention!”)

Does any of this sound familiar?

Now, back to non-fiction books, most of which are written by people you don’t know, can you think of one you bought that made you think, “Oh, I doubt that”?

The last time you had to choose between two or more nonfiction books, did you pick one that said something implausible, or did you choose one that made claims you found more plausible?

Are books that say implausible things more tantalizing to you — or in general — than those that don’t?

Are we conditioned to want to take risks that will expose our own doubts as unrealistic or limiting?



4 thoughts on “Implausible but true?

  1. Hi,

    With 2 kids and the climate here in Singapore being so varied , we have those sessions of building second home every two months or so. And I really hate those sessions. So hope you all recover soon !

    I had recently read a book by a Japanese Author Haruki Murakami called ” Norwegian Wood”. And in that, the main female character has a hard time expressing herself through words though she has lot to say. I feel that way when I read your posts. Your reply and your posts resonates a lot with me. In fact, it is giving lot more clarity to my thoughts and thought process. Thanks a lot for sharing out !

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Well, you’ve made my day with these words!! I love when I read something that helps me explore and articulate my thoughts more clearly, giving me a better idea of where I stand, what’s really bothering me, etc. If something I’ve written has helped you in that way, then I thank God for it. Thank you so much for your kind words! We’re still sick over here — one thing after another, it seems — but we’ll get through it. I’m hoping to get back to work tomorrow. Take care, and have a great week! 🙂


    1. It really depends on my mindset. I approach a lot of writing books with skepticism (especially lately, when I’ve long since given up on the “You’re published, and I’m not, so you must be right” mentality. And depending on where I am spiritually, and how I prepare myself before reading, I have a hard time reading the Bible without asking, “But, wait . . . ” I don’t think it’s a bad thing to have a curious and analytical mind. I just don’t want to chase my own tail (if I had one) by asking questions or jumping to conclusions that are more distracting than helpful to myself or anyone else. I have a contrarian attitude (worse on some days than others) that can get out of hand if I don’t take the time to question my own thinking before questioning someone else’s. 😉 Maybe it’s a product of feeling like an outsider for so long. I don’t know. I’m still a long way from sorting out who I am, really. Thanks so much for taking the time to comment, though, and I hope the rest of the week goes well for you! I need to get more Lysol wipes or something. The kids and husband and I keep taking turns getting sick, and we could build a second home with these empty tissue boxes. 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s